INTRODUCTION
More than 85% of ankle sprains that occur frequently in clinical practice are caused by excessive inversion of ankles.1 Repeated ankle sprains can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI).2 Causes of CAI are looseness of lateral ligaments of the ankle, deterioration of proprioceptive sensation, decrease of posture control ability, and muscle weakness after ankle sprain.3 Dynamic ankle stability is defined as the ability to maintain balance in response to disturbing forces from the outside.4,5 Stabilization of dynamic joints is achieved by contraction of muscles surrounding joints. Eccentric activity of calf muscles and concentric activity of tibialis anterior and posterior muscles are important for ankle stability.6,7 As a method to prevent CAI, strengthening of peroneus longus that, contributes to eversion of the ankle joint has been, suggested.8
Among therapeutic interventions to prevent CAI, squat exercises are typical closed-chain movements that occur simultaneously with movements of ankle, knee, and hip joints. They can be properly performed through overall biomechanics and neuromuscular control.9,10 Squat exercises are also important to maintain good alignment of ankle posture. They have been recommended for the management of CAI.11 Previous studies have shown that one leg squat requires more neuromuscular activity due to reduced mediolateral base of support compared to two leg squats.11-13 Increased neuromuscular activity has also been reported to have a positive effect on proprioception and strength in functional activities.11-13 Although many studies have reported that one-leg squat has various advantages in functional activities, no study has studied the effect of muscle activity on ankle stability.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effect of two types of single-leg squat exercise commonly used in clinical practice for strengthening and rehabilitation of lower limbs on muscles activity of the tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PL), and tibialis posterior (TP). The hypothesis of this study was that muscle activities of TA, PL, and TP muscles at Bulgarian split squat could be higher than those at lunge squat.
METHODS
This study recruited 30 healthy volunteers (15 males, 15 females) who met the selection criteria. Participants were given a detailed explanation of the study procedure. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. This study was conducted in accordance with principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Volunteers who were able to maintain single-leg squat posture for longer than 10 s to check shank muscles activity were recruited for this study. Volunteers who had any neurological, musculoskeletal, or cardiopulmonary problems were excluded. True leg length was used to set the distance between the front and back feet during squatting. True leg length was defined as a distance from the anterior posterior iliac spine of the pelvis to the medial malleolus. Mean age, height, weight, and leg length of these participants were 22.9±1.7 years, 168.5±11.1 cm, 64.0±12.9 kg, and 85.1± 5.9 cm, respectively.
Before measuring electromyography (EMG) signals and attaching electrodes, any hair on the skin to be attached was shaved. The skin was then cleaned with an alcohol swab before attaching the electrodes.14 EMG electrodes were attached to the TA, PL, and TP according to published recommendations.14 A Delsys Trigno EMG system (Delsys, Inc, Wellesley, MA, USA) was used to collect EMG data. EMG signals were converted to digital signals and processed using Works Acquisition EMG analysis software for personal computers (Delsys, Inc, Wellesley, MA, USA). The sampling rate of EMG signals was 2,000 Hz and EMG frequency bandwidth was restricted to 20-500 Hz. The common mode rejection ratio was set at 110 dB. The application of each squat was in random order. Metronome application was used to keep squat posture time constant. EMG measurement and operation of the metronome were started at the same time. After the start of the measurement, a squat posture was made for three seconds at the start position. The squat posture was maintained for five seconds. It was then returned to the start position for three seconds. EMG measurement value analysis and processing were performed using root mean square (RMS) value for five seconds to keep the posture except for the first and last one for three seconds. For Bulgarian split squat, the meta-tarsophalangeal joint of the left foot was placed on the support board which was 30% length of each subject's height. The hip joint was allowed to extend 10 degrees. During the squat, the squat depth was adjusted so that the femur and tibia of the right leg were at an angle of 90 degrees and the right knee moved forward only to the position of the right toe (Figure 1). The starting position of the lunge squat was the same as the Bulgarian split squat. In order to maintain the trunk in upright posture, each hand was placed on the iliac crest. During lunge squat, the left knee was placed about two inches above the floor while the right leg was perpendicular to the floor.
To prevent muscle fatigue, subjects were allowed a 2-min break between measurements. RMS of EMG was used to measure the activity of each shank muscle. Three measurements were taken for each squat and the mean value of RMS of each muscle was calculated.
All analyses were conducted using SPSS (ver. 21.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to confirm that the data were distributed normally. Paired t-test was used to compare differences in muscle activity during each squat condition. Statistical significance was accepted at p<0.05.
RESULTS
There were significant differences in the EMG activities of the TA (t-value=7.591, p<0.01) and PL (t-value=2.771, p<0.05) between squat conditions (Figure 2). During Bulagrian split squat, EMG activities of the TA and PL were significantly higher than those at lunge squat. In contrast, the RMS value of the TP showed no significant difference between the two squat conditions (t-value=0.303, p>0.05) (Figure 2).
DISCUSSION
Squat activity is achieved through cooperative contraction of the hip, knee, and ankle muscles. Various types of squat exercise have been used in physical training and rehabilitation of individuals with CAI or knee joint deformities such as knee valgus and patellofemoral pain.15-17 This study was conducted to examine the effect of two types of squat on muscle activities of the anterior tibialis ankle, long calf muscle, and tibialis ankle contributing to the stability of the ankle joint. As a result of this study, when Bulgarian split squat was applied compared to lunge squirt, muscle activities of TA and PL muscle were increased significantly (p<0.05). This result can be explained by increased tendency to support body weight with anterior leg during the Bulgarian split squat, thereby increasing the contraction force of TA and PL muscles important for ankle stability.
The TA muscle is used as the main actor of ankle dorsiflexion during squat. It occurs as a closed chain movement in the ankle joint. During squat, anterior-posterior ankle stability is mainly dependent on alternating activity of the TA and medial gastrocnemius.18-19When the anterior leg moves forward beyond the vertical line, the eccentric contraction of calf muscle is increased while the activity of TA muscle is increased when moving backward during squat exercise.20 The role of PL muscle is to maintain ankle stability by preventing excessive ankle inversion.21 Supination of the rear foot that occurs during squatting contributes to dynamic stability of the ankle complex through eccentric contraction of PL and peroneus brevis muscles. In particular, the PL muscle limits ankle inversion and plantarflexion to prevent damage to lateral ligaments of the ankle joint.21The TP muscle is the main inverter of the ankle joint. It is a dynamic stabilizer that supports the medial longitudinal arch.22 In the present study, there was no significant difference in average value of TP muscle activity between the two squat conditions. The average value of TP muscle activity during lunge squat was 0.029 mV. It was 0.031 mV during Bulgarian split squat. The reason for this is that the muscle activity of TP during squat movement (which is mainly activated by plantarflexion and inversion of the ankle joint) is relatively low during dorsiflexion and eversion of the ankle joint.
Hip extension occurred more during Bulgarian split squat than that during lunge squat. This caused the body to move forward and naturally increased weight bearing of the anterior foot while the center of pressure was located at the forefoot. Therefore, muscle contractions of the ankle dorsiflexor and everters contributing to ankle stability during Bulgarian split squat seemed to be increased more than that during lunge squat.
This study has several limitations. Although we used a predetermined target frame to control the squat exercise, the speed of squat movement which might affect EMG signals was not controlled for each subject. In addition, surface EMG was used to monitor muscle activity, leaving the possibility of crosstalk from adjacent muscles. Therefore, further studies are needed to verify the effect of various squat exercises on the activity of leg muscles in individuals with musculoskeletal abnormalities of the lower extremity.
CONCLUSIONS
This study investigated the effect of ankle stabilization on lunge squat and Bulgarian split squat to compare muscle activities of the TA, PL, and TP. Muscle activities of the TA and PL during Bulgarian split squat were significantly higher than those during lunge squat. However, there was no significant difference in muscle activity of the TP between the two squat conditions. Therefore, the hypothesis of this study was partially confirmed in that the Bulgarian split squat showed higher ankle stability than lunge squat.