Table 2. Comparison of elbow angular velocity between abdominal nonactivation and activation conditions in P1 and P2
| ANA | AA | p value | t | ES | 95% CI |
| P1 | x-axis | 536.64 ± 273.37 | 556.67 ± 588.54 | 0.847 | –0.195 | 0.04 | –232.88 to 192.82 |
| y-axis | 590.78 ± 612.11 | 525.42 ± 568.83 | 0.471 | 0.733 | 0.15 | –119.10 to 249.82 |
| z-axis | 434.52 ± 186.73 | 559.24 ± 431.36 | 0.073 | –1.875 | 0.38 | –262.30 to 12.86 |
| P2 | x-axis | 1,103.19 ± 665.34 | 1,383.49 ± 1,205.27 | 0.050 | –2.070 | 0.42 | –560.60 to –0.15 |
| y-axis | 740.40 ± 702.08 | 726.77 ± 747.29 | 0.865 | 0.172 | 0.03 | –150.66 to 177.93 |
| z-axis | 687.51 ± 301.03 | 912.41 ± 406.20 | 0.028* | –2.345 | 0.48 | –423.28 to –26.52 |
ANA, abdominal nonactivation; AA, abdominal activation; ES, effect size; CI, confidence interval; P1, phase 1; P2, phase 2.